<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>From the Online - Latest Comments in Comic insurance: how Jonathan Ross gets to keep his job</title><link>http://fromtheonline.disqus.com/</link><description>Reporting from the Isle of Blogs</description><atom:link href="https://fromtheonline.disqus.com/comic_insurance_how_jonathan_ross_gets_to_keep_his_job/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:46:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Comic insurance: how Jonathan Ross gets to keep his job</title><link>http://fromtheonline.com/2008/10/30/comic-insurance-how-jonathan-ross-gets-to-keep-his-job/#comment-5125585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree - it certainly is an issue and the fact that moral panics can leave a feeling of uneasiness (for some of us) only makes it more important to give them attention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just seen this group on Facebook: &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=46446030978&amp;amp;ref=nf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=46446030978&amp;amp;ref=nf"&gt;http://www.facebook.com/gro...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Currently 4,021 (and rapidly rising) members to save Brand and Ross. The group founder makes it clear she doesn't sanction their behaviour.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jtownend</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:46:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic insurance: how Jonathan Ross gets to keep his job</title><link>http://fromtheonline.com/2008/10/30/comic-insurance-how-jonathan-ross-gets-to-keep-his-job/#comment-5125584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Judith,&lt;br&gt;I think you are on to something and it's called moral panics. It might not be entirely a bad thing. It is a bit like a news cycle. We pay attention to something, we thrash around a bit. We all have a good debate and a few people get bruised. Then we move on. It's not perfect, but it is a kind of argument, discussion and learning process. The fact that no-one (usually) dies is good.&lt;br&gt;The fact that The Mail galvanised this particular debate doesn't mean it's not a real issue. The fact that it is celebrities who are under scrutiny and who may lose a few grand is a pleasant relief from real people getting it in the neck.&lt;br&gt;cheers&lt;br&gt;Charlie&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie Beckett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:22:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>